After a quick breakfast, we headed over to U of Chicago for
our second college tour. Last year, I went to a joint info session with Rice,
Brown, Cornell, Columbia, and U of Chicago. I remembered U of Chicago as
sounding pretty quirky, with campus wide events such as the annual scavenger
hunt, but I was not prepared for today’s wonderful info session and campus
tour.
I remembered U of Chicago’s pride in their Core curriculum
from the previous info session, but back then I had thought that I would find
such requirements stifling. After meeting with Callie Brown, the U of Chicago admissions
officer for northern California, I realized that the Core would actually be
great for me. Although I prefer certain areas of study, I have always enjoyed
taking classes in all the four main disciplines–math, English, history, and
science. Contrary to former belief, I would love taking classes in a wide
variety of fields of study. I also didn’t understand before that although the
Core requirements cover math, the sciences, humanities, etc., within that frame
there are plenty of classes to choose from that fulfill those requirements. I
like the idea behind the Core, the belief that every student should have a
broad base of knowledge not confined to his/her chosen field of study.
The Fermi statue |
U of Chicago's largest library–most of the books are underground |
The classes themselves also sound amazing. Core classes are
capped at 19 students, which sounds great because I’ve found from high school
experience that my favorite classes have been when I’ve been fortunate enough
to have classes with about 20 or fewer other students. Although it might seem
incredible to have classes with 20 students in an underfunded public school, the
higher math classes tend to be smaller than other classes.
The phrase most commonly used to describe U of Chicago
classes was “discussion based.” I know I would enjoy classes here because my
junior year AP Lit class was discussion based, and it was one of my favorite
classes. We spent 90% of our time talking about the novels we read, which would
invariably offer new ways to interpret them. I really liked the way that our
teacher would help guide us to new ways of thinking, but mostly let us talk
among ourselves and discover new meanings from each other.
My other favorite high school class was calculus. My Calc AB
teacher was a U of Chicago alumnus, and he was my favorite math teacher ever. I
also had him for geometry my freshman year, and he helped spark my interest in
math. He was a big believer in learning for the sake of learning, an approach
which resonated with me. He tried to help all of his classes learn the right
way to think about math, and always told us that we didn’t need to memorize
formulas (with some exceptions, obviously) if we could figure out how to derive
them. I loved this approach to learning, and when we came to U of Chicago it
became immediately apparent that his teaching philosophy and that of U of
Chicago go hand in hand.
Based on my experiences in AP Lit and calculus, I think that
I would love U of Chicago academics. Although a lot of schools claim to have
small discussion based classes, I am pretty convinced that the U of Chicago is
the real deal because of my math teacher. I love the core beliefs and academic approach here. I really liked campus, as it was a
mix of older and more modern buildings, in an urban setting but still
maintaining a sense of campus unity. From what I’ve experienced so far, I could
definitely see myself here in another year, and I plan on applying.
No comments:
Post a Comment